3 ms·

Note that I didn't suggest replacing structs with NamedTuples entirely - only during prototyping, while you're figuring out what you want your struct to look li

by Sukera 6y ago

Note that I didn't suggest replacing structs with NamedTuples entirely - only during prototyping, while you're figuring out what you want your struct to look like. Structs most definitely will be faster.

oxinabox 6y ago
> Structs most definitely will be faster. I am not 100% sure this is true. Structs will definately look cleaner in the code. Not sure they will be faster though.
- saiojd 6y ago
  Do you know what the differences end up being when it comes to compilation? (not a rhetorical question - I'd like to know)
  - oxinabox 6y ago
    Run `@code_typed` and `@code_llvm` and find out?
saiojd 6y ago
I mean, I could, it's just that its pretty hard to know in advance which structs I will have to modify... Most of the time I only need to do minor edits like add 1 field. By that point I need to recompile anyway if I am to switch to NamedTuples...