> Pretty much all the surveys I see suggest that this will be the most common outcome. Maybe roughly 20% fully remote and 20% mostly back in the office. While

> Pretty much all the surveys I see suggest that this will be the most common outcome. Maybe roughly 20% fully remote and 20% mostly back in the office. While intriguing as an employee, this seems very pricey as the employer. Office space is expensive. Is it worth the cost given the low utilization? Would you really miss out on an excellent employee who cannot come in the 20% of the days others come to the office? How intriguing is it gonna be to hire someone who works the same time zone, is equally qualified but only costs 30%?