3 ms·
There needs to be more of a distinction along two axes: (1) The classroom vs. the rest of school (friends, extracurriculars, etc.) (2) Experiences vs. outcome
by notacoward 6y ago
There needs to be more of a distinction along two axes:
(1) The classroom vs. the rest of school (friends, extracurriculars, etc.)
(2) Experiences vs. outcomes
Do children hate the experience of sitting in a classroom? Sure they do. I did. Do they hate the rest? Not so much. Many of them miss it. My daughter (HS junior) actively replicates as much as she can of that experience, mostly online, all on her own initiative.
Learning is also important, and yes, most students do learn a lot in school. OP's claim that "most of them could barely remember anything" is disingenuous at best, and I suspect actually dishonest. The fact that they couldn't articulate what they had learned, on the spot, doesn't mean they hadn't actually learned anything. That's especially true if faced with an authority figure obviously hostile to the idea that they had learned. That "barely" is also doing a lot of work. How many did answer, but their answers were deemed insufficient? It hardly seems like there was a good-faith effort to gather data in a scientific way.
Is school necessary to learn? That's a complex question, with answers dependent on many factors. The most we can honestly say is "sometimes". Not always. Not never. Pedagogy is a real thing. It's a skill that can be trained, and some people have more aptitude for it than others. I contend that most parents suck at teaching their children, and most children suck at teaching themselves, and most teachers might not be that great at it either but they're still better at it (on average) than the other two. And you know what works better than any of those 99% of the time? Teachers and parents and (at least older) children working together, each contributing what value they can. Which isn't going to happen as much when anti-educational diatribes like OP go unchallenged.
"School sucked" is just not useful. How about ideas for making it suck less, or for other things that don't suck, or ways to combine the two? I don't care about Ian Welsh's experience, which surely owes as much to him as participant as to anything else. I care about how to ensure that present and future children have a better experience.
- bmn__ 6y ago>> [FTA] most of what is taught in school and university is quickly forgotten > claim […] is disingenuous at best I am inclined to believe Welsh's theory due to the fact that school does not use any long-term memorisation techniques which is mentioned elsewhere in the comments. – If we want to make the world better, I am very much in agreement that this must be examined in a scientific way. > anti-educational diatribes like OP That's a straw-man. He does not criticise education, but school. > I care about how to ensure that present and future children have a better experience. This means participating in politics which is almost anywhere a nearly hopeless endeavour. For me this explains why Welsh became a cynic (afaict from his article) instead of being proactive like you wish him to be.
- notacoward 6y ago> He does not criticise education, but school. Are you unaware that "education" is often used to mean both the process and institutions devoted to it? Perhaps I should have said "anti-school" but that would only make it a poor choice of words - not a strawman. > politics which is almost anywhere a nearly hopeless endeavour. Do you expect everyone to share that assumption?