4 ms·
Ok, if it's a problem he's a practicing psychiatrist, that's an ethical issue HE has created by doing the blog. I don't think the NYT is responsible for running
by question000 6y ago
Ok, if it's a problem he's a practicing psychiatrist, that's an ethical issue HE has created by doing the blog. I don't think the NYT is responsible for running his practice ethically.
Don't make comments that jeopardize your business, then blame other people for "being irrational", when they correctly attribute those comments to you, it's simple accountability.
Again the doxxing is a complete myth, everyone knew his name already, he just didn't want attention draw to the fact he's actually being paid a quarter million dollars to do what he's doing.
- throwaway894345 6y agoHe addresses most of your concerns in his own post on why he was shutting down his blog; rather than restating them here I suggest you go read it. Also, I find it particularly abhorrent that one oughtn’t be able to write about controversial topics anonymously, and at least a little ironic given that we’re both doing exactly that.
- shadowgovt 6y agoPseudonymously. It would be difficult to match these accounts to real people but not impossible (dang probably has access to enough signal to make an educated guess).
- damnyou 6y agoUsing your first and middle name is not anonymous by any stretch of the imagination.