4 ms·
Sure, but at that point, by their behavior, NYT devolves from "sacred guardians of democracy" to "fucking troll." Sure, it's not "their job" to worry about SSC
by invalidOrTaken 6y ago
Sure, but at that point, by their behavior, NYT devolves from "sacred guardians of democracy" to "fucking troll."
Sure, it's not "their job" to worry about SSC. But then, nobody's paying me to be nice on HN. That's fine! I don't want money! I'm civil because it's good for the space, and because it's the right thing to do. If I weren't, I would, effectively, be an enemy of the space.
SSC has been a beacon of...reasonableness, of niceness, of clarity (though not necessarily agreement), on the internet, for near a decade. You know what we call people who screw that up online? Trolls. Why should companies be any different?
Nothing will happen, nobody is going to light their building on fire or whatever. Their name will just carry that much less weight in the future.
- handmodel 6y agofwiw the NYT's slogan isn't "sacred guardians of democracy" or "Democracy Dies in Darkness". That's the Washington Post. It's slogan is "All The News That's Fit To Print". It is considered The Newspaper of Record for the US and sees itself as having value for future historical research.
- jessaustin 6y agoFor WaPo, it's not so much a slogan as a mission statement.