5 ms·

Your article is about pesticide use. But I am talking about the increase in herbicide use. Monsanto’s “roundup ready” line of GMO products is intended to be bla

Your article is about pesticide use. But I am talking about the increase in herbicide use. Monsanto’s “roundup ready” line of GMO products is intended to be blanketed with glyphosate (aka RoundUp), a powerful herbicide. According to the following study, glyphosate use increased 15 fold since the introduction of “Roundup Ready” products. https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0 https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-0...

labawi 6y ago
Funny thing is, once people started blanketing with roundup, it didn't take long for roundup-resistant weeds to develop. > Growing reliance on the broad-spectrum herbicide glyphosate has triggered the spread of tolerant and resistant weeds in the U.S. and globally [5–10]. To combat weeds less sensitive to glyphosate, farmers typically increase glyphosate application rates and spray more often [11–13]. In addition, next-generation herbicide-tolerant crops are, or will soon be on the market genetically engineered to withstand the application of additional herbicides (up to over a dozen), including herbicides posing greater ecological, crop damage, and human health risks (e.g., 2,4-D and dicamba) [6].
bluGill 6y ago
Roundup is used at tiny quantities. Yes 15 times as much is used, but that is still much less than a liter per hectare. And roundup strongly binds to dirt where nothing can get it until it degrades in about half a year. It degrades into common elements in the soil so it isn't making any difference.
- TaylorAlexander 6y ago
  According to this link, our original belief that it’s use is largely benign needs further study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29117584/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29117584/
  - bluGill 6y ago
    Anyone can publish anything. Such as calling out the WHO even though they ignored most of the evidence. Then speculation about antibiotic resistance even though bacteria don't use the pathways glyphosphate targets.

labawi 6y ago

Funny thing is, once people started blanketing with roundup, it didn't take long for roundup-resistant weeds to develop. > Growing reliance on the broad-spectrum herbicide glyphosate has triggered the spread of tolerant and resistant weeds in the U.S. and globally [5–10]. To combat weeds less sensitive to glyphosate, farmers typically increase glyphosate application rates and spray more often [11–13]. In addition, next-generation herbicide-tolerant crops are, or will soon be on the market genetically engineered to withstand the application of additional herbicides (up to over a dozen), including herbicides posing greater ecological, crop damage, and human health risks (e.g., 2,4-D and dicamba) [6].

bluGill 6y ago

Roundup is used at tiny quantities. Yes 15 times as much is used, but that is still much less than a liter per hectare. And roundup strongly binds to dirt where nothing can get it until it degrades in about half a year. It degrades into common elements in the soil so it isn't making any difference.

TaylorAlexander 6y ago
According to this link, our original belief that it’s use is largely benign needs further study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29117584/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29117584/
- bluGill 6y ago
  Anyone can publish anything. Such as calling out the WHO even though they ignored most of the evidence. Then speculation about antibiotic resistance even though bacteria don't use the pathways glyphosphate targets.