> enforcing interoperability. It's called "common carrier immunity". Telephone companies have had it for decades, maybe even centuries. It works great. They

> enforcing interoperability. It's called "common carrier immunity". Telephone companies have had it for decades, maybe even centuries. It works great. They're not responsible for words spoken on their telephone network as long as they don't regulate that content in any way. Section 230 simply should have offered common carrier immunity to websites when they act as common carriers. Problem solved.