> He said he was concerned about patients finding the pseudonym when they searched for his real name. Regardless of the content. I figured the extension of "an

> He said he was concerned about patients finding the pseudonym when they searched for his real name. Regardless of the content. I figured the extension of "and the pseudonym relates to the content" is implied, as knowing "Scott Alexander Siskind" goes by "Scott Alexander" online is not very useful information. > The NYT article made specific claims. It's up to the reader to decide what to infer. "I've only ever seen pseudalopex on a forum that's known to be frequented by racists" is a specific claim that is true, but it's clearly making strong inferences about your character. Journalists play this game all the time in hit pieces.