4 ms·
Not mentioned on this page, but a more virtuous campaign to ban a film in Boston was Monroe Trotter's attempt to ban the racist film Birth of a Nation: "Ironic
by gxqoz 6y ago
Not mentioned on this page, but a more virtuous campaign to ban a film in Boston was Monroe Trotter's attempt to ban the racist film Birth of a Nation:
"Ironically, Trotter had succeeded in tightening a censorship bill but failed to stop the movie. It was a victory for artistic freedom but not necessarily a defeat for civil liberties, since the conflict had nurtured a young NAACP, which gained strength in the ensuing battles for civil rights in the coming century. As for Griffith, in an interview he gave in 1941 when he was virtually forgotten in Hollywood, he remarked that “because of the social progress which Negroes achieved” given the oppression they faced, “it is best that The Birth of a Nation in its present form be withheld from public exhibition.’’"
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fight-to-ban-birth-of-a-nation https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fight-to-ban-birth-of-a-na...
- konjin 6y agoAnd it worked so well too. Censors aren't there to protect the public, they are there to make busy bodies feel good about themselves.