> Zig is neither a better C nor a better C++, but an entirely... I agree with your point because zig has evolved, but I do think that it is important to note

> Zig is neither a better C nor a better C++, but an entirely... I agree with your point because zig has evolved, but I do think that it is important to note at least for historical purposes, that zig was created literally as a "better c", and a lot of decisions are made because of some specific pain point X or Y in c