4 ms·
I've yet to meet anyone who thinks UBI is bad for the poor people. However I've heard no one explain how it can be effectively paid for. Everytime there is thi
by woofcat 6y ago
I've yet to meet anyone who thinks UBI is bad for the poor people. However I've heard no one explain how it can be effectively paid for.
Everytime there is this massive hand waving of laying off x thousands of civil servants, which isn't realistic in my mind.
- mlyle 6y agoInitially, something like this: you give $3.5k/yr to everyone. You cut $3.5k of specific, expensive to administer benefits/year from the people (20% of pop) receiving public benefits. You reduce social security payments by ~$3.5k (about 15% of pop). There's also interaction with EITC and likely some elimination of tax credits with low phase-outs. Then, you reap some administrative benefit, because you've eliminated a lot of complexity in administration of these programs. Then, you increase taxation by a bit less than $3500 on average for everyone else, maybe by increasing taxation by some uniform percentage on everything over the poverty line and maybe even sliding down tax brackets a little (it still would be more progressive). You probably can't get rid of everything: e.g. SNAP makes sure people spend at least some money on food for their kids.