> Women aren't interested in joining because of the sexist nature of the industries. Reversing the order of the causation is making excuses for sexism and is it

> Women aren't interested in joining because of the sexist nature of the industries. Reversing the order of the causation is making excuses for sexism and is itself sexist. Do you have any support for that claim, because AFAIK your claim has as much substance as saying that they're simply not interested, which is not much. > The New York Times does not have to explain this to its audience. They already know. And Trump doesn't have to explain to his followers how the election was stolen, they know it was. That's how dogmatic ideologies work.