3 ms·
With the recent research supporting that supernovae aren't a perfect uniform explosion but that it can be lopsided, doesn't it follow that a black hole won't fo
by AtlasBarfed 6y ago
With the recent research supporting that supernovae aren't a perfect uniform explosion but that it can be lopsided, doesn't it follow that a black hole won't form with a perfect implosion?
And when the singularity appears, isn't that all mass falling infinitely towards the singularity point at near light speed, and doesn't that impact the travel of the gravity waves at those speeds and time dilations to outside frames of reference?
The most extreme of this would be a black hole merger I'd guess. Do they formall merge once the center of mass of one of the holes enters the event horizon of the other? Can the event horizons "brush against one another?
Generally it's thought that a black hole is a perfect sphere if no spin, or a perfect oblong if not?
- gus_massa 6y agoAs far as I can tell, you are right. From the article: > What’s more, the hair is expected to be incredibly short-lived, lasting just fractions of a second. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hair_theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hair_theorem > Thus any black hole that has been isolated for a significant period of time can be described by the Kerr–Newman metric in an appropriately chosen reference frame. The "no hair theorem" was a result for a black hole after some time without interesting changes, so I don't see the contradiction here.