3 ms·
I don't understand Roko's Basilisk. It seems like a mild twist on Pascal's wager, and like Pascal's wager, it has the following problem: I don't see a convincin
by croissants 6y ago
I don't understand Roko's Basilisk. It seems like a mild twist on Pascal's wager, and like Pascal's wager, it has the following problem: I don't see a convincing argument that we actually know what behavior the Basilisk/God actually wants. It's equally plausible to me that the Basilisk/God wants people to be brave and live out their beliefs (which might be "I think this concept makes no sense") and would actually punish the craven pursuit of a different action in the hopes of pleasing the Basilisk/God.
As long as we're suspending enough disbelief to take seriously the prospect of a deity that wants to punish us, it seems like a pretty small jump to believe that we can't predict how that punishment is going to get decided. So, rather conveniently, we can just live without thinking too hard about the Basilisk/God.
- stale2002 6y agoThe whole argument is just a dumb troll that people bring up a bunch. It is not some serious thing that anyone is worried about. But because the argument sounds so silly, the trolls come out of the woodwork and bring it up all the time, in attempt to attack people for something that nobody actually believes anyway.