3 ms·

That is awesome, thank you! (A page full of amazing prose samples from SSC)

• remarkEon 6y ago
  Yes, those are great, and makes you realize that NYT not quoting SSC was intentional, because it would nuke the narrative they're trying to build. Edit: here's an example, that's pretty instructive. From NYT: >That week, a Google employee named James Damore wrote a memo arguing that the low number of women in technical positions at the company was a result of biological differences, not anything else — a memo he was later fired over. [Emphasis added] But that isn't what Damore said, and you can go google and read the memo yourself, which NYT doesn't link for you, because it would directly contradict their framing.