3 ms·
The best thing to do is for everyone to ignore this article and don't let it get traction via Streisand. It's clearly not written in good faith. The reporter ha
by mushufasa 6y ago
The best thing to do is for everyone to ignore this article and don't let it get traction via Streisand. It's clearly not written in good faith. The reporter had to be biased against siskind after the saga and conflict they went through.
The second best thing is, should any reporters be reading this, to take the opportunity to write a better article.
- devlopr 6y agoThe best is to remember this reporter and newspaper and trust them less.
- whoooooo123 6y agoReally, why does anyone take the NYT seriously anymore? It seems that barely a week goes by these days without some new way in which they discredit themselves. If you were a conservative "anti-woke" mole who'd infiltrated the NYT and wanted to publish fake content in a deliberate attempt to destroy the organisation's credibility you couldn't have done much better than the self-inflicted wounds the NYT has been pouring out again and again and again lately.
- prepend 6y ago> why does anyone take the NYT seriously anymore Does anyone? I’m not sure credible people do and no one I respect has referenced a Times article for other than crossword, Sunday magazine, fluff stuff.
- matheusmoreira 6y agoAn even better approach would be to distrust all reporters and newspapers and remember the exceptional good ones.
- notSupplied 6y agoActually, this article may be creating a streisand effect for Codex.