4 ms·
well Google's using all three in different ways... and another trend on prog. langs: they're becoming more and more similar feature-wise (eg. pattern matching)
by high_density 6y ago
well Google's using all three in different ways...
and another trend on prog. langs: they're becoming more and more similar feature-wise (eg. pattern matching)
- yannoninator 6y ago> well Google's using all three in different ways... So that justifies giving them a seat at the board of directors and not just a sponsorship? Apple and Facebook both use Rust but I don't see anything about them being on the board (at least Facebook for now), the least I expect is sponsorship.
- ta988 6y agoGoogle contributes a lot to Kotlin though. So they are not just sponsors.
- yannoninator 6y agoInteresting perspective, so just like Rust then? Seems like Google can just buy board seats then.
- ta988 6y agoIf you mean by dedicating workforce (which costs money, and a lot for them because of their salaries policies) they are buying a seat? Yes. The same way a major contributor (not just code, but doc, funding, community building...) to a FOSS project often has more power on the decisions than users. Now I would be unhappy to see a company that just pours millions in a project, gets to take decisions but doesn't do anything else to make the project better. But I don't believe that's the case here.
- yannoninator 6y agoYou can do all of this without getting a board seat. It seems we are all OK with allowing this to happen, but we shall see.
- dieortin 6y agoI’m curious, what does Apple use Rust for?
- steveklabnik 6y agoThey were hiring for their storage and networking groups, but that’s all we know.
- chuckSu 6y agoWe get it... you hate google