3 ms·
Fair point. Though who knows, it's hard/impossible to say. For some individuals, it might have been positive, for others, perhaps negative. Overall however,
by danielbarla 6y ago
Fair point. Though who knows, it's hard/impossible to say. For some individuals, it might have been positive, for others, perhaps negative. Overall however, I would not say that today's programmers are of worse quality, on average. (It's hard to compare however, as clearly we have a 10/20/30 year experience gap over them.)
- wegs 6y agoIt ebbs and flows. There was a low point in the late nineties and early 2000's: * Windows 95 removed all thought of the user as a programmer, killing things like QBasic. * Apple was doing likewise, even killing Hypercard. * The web wasn't in its prime yet, limited to HTML 2.0 and 3.2, and really lousy JavaScript. * Even electronics was tough, since DIP parts were being replaced with SMT, and the service manual was starting to become a relic, but things like Arduino and RPi didn't exist yet, and making PCBs was $$$$$. * Shop classes were on the decline in schools, but makerspaces weren't in yet. I feel bad for kids growing up then. Short of installing a Linux distribution, kids were left out in the cold for being anything other than consumers of technology. There was really a golden age in the eighties and early nineties, and we seem to be in another golden age right now.