3 ms·
You're right, it's not a good figure https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/heatherknight/article/Businesses-must-contribute-more-to-city-s-13178743.php https://w
by sharkjacobs 6y ago
You're right, it's not a good figure
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/heatherknight/article/Businesses-must-contribute-more-to-city-s-13178743.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/heatherknight/article/Bu...
TLDR:
> Last year, the city spent $305 million on homelessness. In the most recent one-night homeless tally in January 2017, the counters found 7,499 homeless people. People understandably divide the first number by the second and come up with the so-called fact that the city spends $40,672 per homeless person per year.
> “That’s a ridiculous number,” said Jeff Kositsky, director of the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing. “If that was the case, I should definitely not have a job.”
> Of the $250 million he spent last year, two-thirds went to people who aren’t homeless at all. That’s the amount spent on rental subsidies, eviction prevention and permanent supportive housing. Those are great causes, but they’re aimed at preventing people from becoming homeless or to house the formerly homeless.
> But divide $57 million by 15,000 homeless people who need city help each year, and you see the city spends $3,800 per person per year. Or $10.41 a day.
- scarmig 6y agoSo, that ~200 million goes to supporting ~10k would-be homeless in supportive housing. That's ~$20k/year per person in supportive housing. That's also before accounting for Prop C which postdates that article, which will bring in an additional ~$250 million pa. You can't say "if you exclude the people SF spends the most on, then it doesn't spend that much per person!" Though I concede the average is probably closer to $25k/person serviced than $50k/person.
- smnrchrds 6y agoIt seems to be per household, not per person.