> I don't want poop on the streets. I doubt Samsung fab employees are going to do that. I don't get the relevance of this to our discussion. > More recently i

> I don't want poop on the streets. I doubt Samsung fab employees are going to do that. I don't get the relevance of this to our discussion. > More recently in UK over 100 people burned to death because a massive skyscraper was built with violations of fire safety, and then plasteres with more flamable material. Again, this is irrelevant. A parking lot, just by existing is not a fire risk. And even if it does pose some fire risk, putting solar panels and the required electrical equipment on the parking lot will only increase that risk. > Do these entities not benefit from not having the building they manage burn to the ground? No, they don't. Ask the owners of that skyscraper. What's your point again?