I never mentioned “race”, and neither did the DA in her court filings, as far as I know. The problem she had with his decision was that he was “favoring” certa

I never mentioned “race”, and neither did the DA in her court filings, as far as I know. The problem she had with his decision was that he was “favoring” certain people in an unfair and illegal way — a conclusion that could only be reached by disregarding every question about the incident except “who”. That approach finds its origin in modern progressivism, where the only truth that matters is “who”.