3 ms·
> Cost is a really solid argument against MSSQL If you're a small 2-5 person team, sure. But once dev payroll breaks $1M/yr, paying ~$100k for SQL Server doesn
by tomnipotent 6y ago
> Cost is a really solid argument against MSSQL
If you're a small 2-5 person team, sure. But once dev payroll breaks $1M/yr, paying ~$100k for SQL Server doesn't seem so bad anymore.
- runako 6y agoThat doesn't match the economics at any company I've seen. Dev payroll of $1mm/yr gets you something like 6 devs or fewer in the US. I have yet to encounter a team that would rather have SQL Server than another developer given the explicit choice between the two (assuming easy migration, etc.).