>will be able to support just 485,000 simultaneous users at 100Mbit/s across the entire US I mean sure, but presumably more considering they aren't going to be

>will be able to support just 485,000 simultaneous users at 100Mbit/s across the entire US I mean sure, but presumably more considering they aren't going to be super correlated? Based on a quick search, it appears that average bandwidth used by cable subscribers (who only use internet and not TV) is probably a little over 1 Mbps (and that's higher than the median) so it seems like your figures imply the ability to handle around 30-40 million customers.