> obsessed with virtue To point out making this claim, while also noting that what people consider 'virtue' changes, is implicitly treating relativist ethics a

> obsessed with virtue To point out making this claim, while also noting that what people consider 'virtue' changes, is implicitly treating relativist ethics as valid; Leaving this assumption unchallenged is a key part in enabling counter-productive 'inclusion' when it occurs; Similarly, it allows one group to define it's ideology as 'virtue' simply by being 'new' or 'modern' without needing to define 'why' it is virtue... (to note: This is not at all the same as, and I'm absolutely not saying that 'inclusion' is implictly counter-productive)