2 ms·
There is no data to support that, a racial discrimination law should be levied here, because now the action just occurred. edit: so 20 year old data is being m
by vmception 6y ago
There is no data to support that, a racial discrimination law should be levied here, because now the action just occurred.
edit: so 20 year old data is being masqueraded as modern civil rights realities. never seen that before in any other topic.
- fallingknife 6y agoNo data? There are supreme court decisions on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grutter_v._Bollinger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grutter_v._Bollinger
- vmception 6y agoIn 2003 a racial discrimination law favored one group, your premise was about 2021. In the last 18 years (oh wow people born then can vote now!) race-based discrimination statutes are routinely enforced for all groups, including in favor of the majority group when they have been discriminated against by race by a potential or current employer. Take a quick browse at the EOCC enforcement actions, or California's DFEH, and other agencies and other court cases.
- vmception 6y agoa racial discrimination law should be levied here, because now the action just occurred. the laws are not pre-emptive.
- bluefirebrand 6y agoShould be, but we know it won't.