4 ms·

It might be easier with copyright, since it wont rely on the local prosecutor to do anything, the artist can sue

• retrac 6y ago
  The copyright holder could sue, which is rarely the artist. In this case it would be Sony.
  • tzs 6y ago
    Paul McCartney got the Beatles catalog back from Sony in mid-2017 [1]. [1] https://liveforlivemusic.com/news/paul-mccartney-beatles-rights-win/ https://liveforlivemusic.com/news/paul-mccartney-beatles-rig...
  • bogomipz 6y ago
    This would actually fall under a "sync license" which requires approval by both the master rights holder as well as the composition owner which is the artist although it cold be the artist and their publishing company if they have sold shares to them. See "permissions needed" here: https://musicbusinessmadeeasy.com/understanding-the-music-synchronization-license/ https://musicbusinessmadeeasy.com/understanding-the-music-sy...