2 ms·

You’re not the literal and legal property of your government. The comparison is still not apt.

• rowanG077 6y ago
  You were also not the literal and legal property of your lord. It wasn't slavery.
  • ashtonkem 6y ago
    Most serfs weren’t slaves[0], true. But in many areas serfs were legally bound to the land that they occupied. If that land changed hands, so did the serfs legally. That’s no slavery, but it’s also far worse than being a freeman. In all areas they had fewer rights and more obligations than freemen; there’s a reason why being reduced to serfdom was often done out of economic need, and why freedom often had to be bought. 0 - Some types of serfs were literally slaves and could be traded as such. See Russian Kholops.