Fair point, I could have worded it better. But I think it's a reach to call this "clickbait". Article titles are shortened all the time, and you can't expect

Fair point, I could have worded it better. But I think it's a reach to call this "clickbait". Article titles are shortened all the time, and you can't expect them to have all the context in the title. However, one should reasonably expect people participating in a discussion about an article (particularly when posting criticism) to have actually read it. Complaining about something that is provably false in the first sentence of the article is the bigger sin here, is it not?