4 ms·
I agree that my post is just additional noise. But it's noise not disturbing a good signal. Let me just point out that I think discussing sides of what's linke
by matsemann 6y ago
I agree that my post is just additional noise. But it's noise not disturbing a good signal.
Let me just point out that I think discussing sides of what's linked can be interesting and relevant. In this instance I think discussing privacy around the amount of data Spotify stores is a relevant subdiscussion worth exploring. But complaints about their UI doesn't feel very relevant. Etc.
Now that's only my opinion. What made me write my comment was that it was literally no one discussing the concepts of the article in the first 15 or so comments. Which I found a bit disappointing as I thought the tech is interesting.
- chishaku 6y ago> But it's noise not disturbing a good signal. The signal will always be weak early on. Look at the comments now and it's clear that the upvote/downvote mechanisms are working sufficiently to address your concern. This should not be surprising. It's typically faster to not read the article and spew superficial off-topic comments than to write on-topic, substantive, and technical comments.
- matsemann 6y agoGood point, although I felt it was more than normal in this case. Having my meta comment on top is also no good, hopefully it can be demoted somehow. Will try to flag this thread.