3 ms·

> If an employer over-rewards a group of employees, it's at the expensive of the employer, not the other employees. I don't know where you got this idea... Mo

> If an employer over-rewards a group of employees, it's at the expensive of the employer, not the other employees. I don't know where you got this idea... Most places I've worked have at the very least a vague definition of a budget for talent acquisition and retention If you give person X more of a bonus, there's less to go around for everyone. It's not that complicated.

vidarh 6y ago
It's been very explicit some places I've worked. I was given an allocation of X thousands pounds of raises and Y share options. This was allocated based on a certain percentage of the current remuneration of the overall team, and combined with a set of guidelines for how to allocate it based on team performance. If I wanted to go above my allocation, I'd have to justify it a couple of management levels up, and if approved they'd recoup it by adjusting someone in another team in my group down.