> This is one of these decisions that seems to me to fly in the face of common sense and reflects some subjective feeling on the part of the judge that having C

> This is one of these decisions that seems to me to fly in the face of common sense and reflects some subjective feeling on the part of the judge that having CBP look through your phone "seems reasonable to them," which to me isn't reasonable at all. I think that's exactly what happened, but the judge is severely underestimating the kind of data on their phone. Frankly, I really wish that when judges rule something "reasonable" that they are then immediately subjected to whatever they've deemed reasonable by some civil rights group (the ACLU is an obvious one). I think this would get reversed in a heartbeat if the ACLU could roleplay CBP and demonstrate just how much you can get leverage on people using the contents of their phone. I don't think it's malicious, just ignorant.