3 ms·
1. There are many ways to define species: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species#Definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species#Definition 2. We can't actuall
by cheph 6y ago
1. There are many ways to define species: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species#Definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species#Definition
2. We can't actually test sexual reproduction of extinct "species"
3. Even if we go with the one definition of species which
is "largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring", evidence of some reproduction does not speak to how often such reproduction led to fertile offspring. For example "No evidence of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA has been found in modern humans"[1], and "Neanderthal males might not have had viable male offspring with Anatomically modern humans females"[2].
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interbreeding_between_archaic_and_modern_humans#Mitochondrial_DNA_and_Y_chromosome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interbreeding_between_archaic_...
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_genetics#Interbreeding_with_modern_humans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_genetics#Interbree...
- nickles 6y agoYou’re not presenting your sources accurately. The full quote from [1]: > No evidence of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA has been found in modern humans. This suggests that successful Neanderthal admixture happened in pairings with Neanderthal males and modern human females. The full quote from [2]: > A 2016 study presented evidence that Neanderthal males might not have had viable male offspring with AMH females. This could explain why no modern man to date has been found with a Neanderthal Y chromosome. Also from [2]: > Positive evidence for admixture was first published in May 2010. Neanderthal-inherited genetic material is found in all non-African populations and was initially reported to comprise 1 to 4 percent of the genome. This fraction was later refined to 1.5 to 2.1 percent.
- cheph 6y ago> You’re not presenting your sources accurately. I am.