> Inversely, in my career there's only been a handful of times where cryptographic randomness was too slow. Yeah, that's the opposite of my experience. Often

> Inversely, in my career there's only been a handful of times where cryptographic randomness was too slow. Yeah, that's the opposite of my experience. Often the libc random is too slow and limiting performance and I need to substitute something even faster. But I agree that using something that is securely random by default is a good idea. People can substitute faster thing fit for their purpose if needed.