3 ms·
The thing is, you believe your basic facts. Believe, not know. But you call it 'knowing'. Knowing is when you verify facts for yourself. By not checking inf
by feralimal 6y ago
The thing is, you believe your basic facts. Believe, not know. But you call it 'knowing'.
Knowing is when you verify facts for yourself. By not checking information, but just accepting whatever is handed to you, you are applying no filter to your reality. You filter only what has been deemed acceptable for you to filter - did Trump say that, did google do that, etc. The basic 'facts' are accepted without contention. Or any verified evidence. All that's needed is for someone to make a claim or show it on TV and that's basically right, right?
Have you ever looked at the replication crisis - where 70% of science studies cannot be reproduced? Or the nature of science funding - its corporations, the government and the military. If we are living in a fascist dictatorship, as I believe is evident, then that is a closed loop. Only what is deemed valuable to those stakeholders is investigated and presented as true.
- mrtesthah 6y ago>By not checking information but just accepting whatever is handed to you... >The basic 'facts' are accepted without contention. Or any verified evidence. >All that's needed is for someone to make a claim or show it on TV and that's basically right, right? Who exactly are you speaking about here? What gives you the right to presume -- without any evidence -- that others don't verify and critically examine what they read and hear? Do you actually believe that you're the only person who does this? Your attitude is blatantly condescending and supercilious.