4 ms·
> Excellent question, especially since the code is copy-pasted without crediting the original authors. That seems like a serious allegation. Can you back that
by tpush 6y ago
> Excellent question, especially since the code is copy-pasted without crediting the original authors.
That seems like a serious allegation. Can you back that up?
- zapita 6y agoIt’s right there in the repo history. Start from the first commits. I don’t know how serious of an allegation it is: copy-pasting open-source code without crediting it properly is rude, but not illegal.
- notriddle 6y agoNo, that’s totally illegal. The Docker Engine is licensed under the Apache-2.0 terms, which require attribution.
- SEJeff 6y agoIt is actually against copyright law, and redhat legal would take any allegations very seriously. What in specific do you think is copy and pasted code?
- hda111 6y agoDocker is properly attributed to, see https://github.com/containers/storage/blob/a4cc7aa79e050c976e9c44d005e44e5dce5a850a/NOTICE https://github.com/containers/storage/blob/a4cc7aa79e050c976... I think OP wanted to say that Podman hates Docker what is not I feel when I'm interacting with the community there. People who use Podman do it because of it's additional features that Docker does not have, like starting an Container from a rootfs or mounting the currect directory in a container using "." as path. Also building containers using a shellscript is supported. No need to learn the Dockerfile syntax. There are lot of small things that make Podman better integrated into Linux systems: running the container via systemd is a lot more intuitive.