2 ms·
>Except this wasn't the federal bailouts. Those are an entirely different beast. It's talking strictly about income stagnation. Which rests on the fundamentall
by treis 6y ago
>Except this wasn't the federal bailouts. Those are an entirely different beast. It's talking strictly about income stagnation.
Which rests on the fundamentally incorrect assumption that a dollar a rich person gets means that a poor person is a dollar poorer.
- fuzzfactor 6y agodid not downvote, but More accurate to calculate how it still regularly costs a million poor people a dollar each to make one person a new millionaire. But we all know a $Million doesn't buy what it was supposed to any more, so all million-and-one of them are screwed anyway. And poor people actually used to be able to afford this kind of spending.