3 ms·
I guess I was reading too much into the "in his day" part. My point was that the world hasn't gotten less sensitive to his attitude and speech. It might have ev
by tinalumfoil 6y ago
I guess I was reading too much into the "in his day" part. My point was that the world hasn't gotten less sensitive to his attitude and speech. It might have even gotten more sensitive.
- bdcravens 6y agoYes, I was responding to a comment implying his pornography would be considered tame by today's standards (which it would, but you must consider the context of the time). I agree that his non-pornographic content would be viewed with a very sensitive eye today.