4 ms·
Sometimes, article have low information/length ratio. This one has a ton information of information, but still fail to satisfy because it has a low point/infor
by pierrebai 6y ago
Sometimes, article have low information/length ratio.
This one has a ton information of information, but still fail to satisfy because it has a low point/information ratio. It just rambles on with data points and examples.
AFAICT, the points made are:
* Apple switched from vans to subarus for data gathering. (IOW, they changed their data acquisition equipment.)
* Their new equipment must be better, because Apple seem to have thrown away all data they acquired with vans.
* Yet, they still lack tons of labels and mis-label / mis-place many buildings / store etc.
* Apple seems to be processing data faster than they used to.
... and even these points are must of the shrug / why would I care category, except maybe the fact that most cities are not labeled.
Take-away: you're better off with google street view.
- ardy42 6y ago> This one has a ton information of information, but still fail to satisfy because it has a low point/information ratio. It just rambles on with data points and examples. On his front page, this article appear in this section: > Research + Updates > Material for future essays + updates to earlier essays It honestly reads more like notes than an article.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Terretta 6y ago> they still ... mis-label / mis-place many buildings On the contrary, that was in the traditional map. The author’s actual point came after that: that Look Around didn’t have the same data quality issues, proving so free of such errors the author speculated whether they’re using manual labeling.