3 ms·

> Buy / bribe miners to have a constant 50% attack even if they lose billions / tens of billions of dollars (This is a genuine question, I'm not nearly as well

> Buy / bribe miners to have a constant 50% attack even if they lose billions / tens of billions of dollars (This is a genuine question, I'm not nearly as well-read on this as I should be) What would this achieve, and whom would benefit? My naïve assumption would be that coordinated, deliberate (over-)regulating of cryptocurrencies and/or attempting to manipulate prices lower might be a) much cheaper, and b) much more effective. If you bring enough political pressure to bear on any particular international financial flow, it takes quite a lot of (political!) effort to stand up to that. Look at what happened between the US and Iran re: the reintroduction of sanctions; then look at the response from France, the United Kingdom, and Germany.[0][1] Can Bitcoin and its backers (yet?) muster sufficient political muscle to respond if there's a coordinated political attack? [0] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_ATA(2018)630273 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?re... [1] https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_trading_with_iran_special_purpose_vehicle_how_it_can_work/ https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_trading_with_iran_special...

xiphias2 6y ago
It's easy to censor Iran if you control the international clearing system. What you suggest is more similar to banning gold, which happened 100 years ago in US. Where do you think gold price went after that?
- logifail 6y ago
  > What you suggest is more similar to banning gold, which happened 100 years ago in US. Where do you think gold price went after that? Where the gold price when after 1933 isn't that relevant to all those who were forced to sell their gold to the Federal Reserve at that time.[0] Thought experiment: were your national government to pass a law forcing you to sell your Bitcoin to them at a price they pick, you would appear to have precisely two options: 1) sell, or 2) be prosecuted There's plenty of precedent for 2) [1], so I'm guessing most people would end up opting to sell. That would appear to be the end of that... (?) For clarity: no, I don't think this is right. It might happen anyway. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102#Prosecutions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102#Prosecuti...

xiphias2 6y ago

It's easy to censor Iran if you control the international clearing system. What you suggest is more similar to banning gold, which happened 100 years ago in US. Where do you think gold price went after that?

logifail 6y ago
> What you suggest is more similar to banning gold, which happened 100 years ago in US. Where do you think gold price went after that? Where the gold price when after 1933 isn't that relevant to all those who were forced to sell their gold to the Federal Reserve at that time.[0] Thought experiment: were your national government to pass a law forcing you to sell your Bitcoin to them at a price they pick, you would appear to have precisely two options: 1) sell, or 2) be prosecuted There's plenty of precedent for 2) [1], so I'm guessing most people would end up opting to sell. That would appear to be the end of that... (?) For clarity: no, I don't think this is right. It might happen anyway. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102#Prosecutions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102#Prosecuti...