4 ms·
It isn't the law that is broken, but rather the enforcement. All the concerns you raise here are covered by the law. It's illegal for it to take longer to reje
by mnw21cam 6y ago
It isn't the law that is broken, but rather the enforcement.
All the concerns you raise here are covered by the law. It's illegal for it to take longer to reject tracking than to allow it, which should ban all these web site that try to get you to scroll through several hundred options turning them all off. "Legitimate interest" means that the whatever data they want to process is a necessary step in order to do what the user has asked for - for instance, the web site has to be able to set a login token cookie when you log in, and that's allowed because you literally just asked to log in, and that's the only way the web site can do what you asked.
All these web site are illegally making the cookie experience dire. They are doing it so that they can:
1. Collect data from people who get fed up and click accept, people who accidentally click accept, etc.
2. Annoy everyone and make people think that the laws are broken, which increases the chances that the laws will be changed in the future.
Enforcement would help with this, but there's little sign of it happening.
- tolbish 6y agoLaws with no teeth are effectively broken laws.
- mnw21cam 6y agoThe law has teeth. It just appears that the regulators aren't chewing.
- riggsdk 6y agoIsn’t that in practice the same thing?
- mnw21cam 6y agoI would argue no, because the problem can be fixed without changing the laws, and I'm not convinced that it can be fixed by just changing the laws. People doing things that are illegal doesn't get fixed by making another law against it. So no, I don't think it means that in practice it is the same thing.
- TazeTSchnitzel 6y agoThere's various attempts to enforce the law, the problem is the legal system is pretty slow and it also relies on other websites actually conforming when the law is clarified by another being fined, and they really do not want to.