3 ms·
Well, that what happens if you strive for adding "syntactic sugar" and other meaningless features to your language instead of performance.
by JakeO_ 6y ago
Well, that what happens if you strive for adding "syntactic sugar" and other meaningless features to your language instead of performance.
- ldrndll 6y agoCan you say why you think this is the case? Matz has very much made performance a focus: they've continued to improve the Ruby VM and added JIT, for example. Likewise, many of the non-performance related improvements in recent Ruby version have immediately been useful to me as a Rubyist. I'm not sure what meaningless features you refer to, but I'd be interested in seeing them enumerated.