4 ms·
TL;DR - Shack designers who submitted for the competition failed at "customer development". They didn't ask how the customers use cheap dwellings now (store too
by GBond 15y ago
TL;DR - Shack designers who submitted for the competition failed at "customer development". They didn't ask how the customers use cheap dwellings now (store tools, build stuff, & upgrade).
- bandushrew 15y agoThose who like their current homes will stay in them. Those who think the 300$ house is a good idea will use them. Whats the problem? name any product and I can find an argument on the side of nobody choosing to use it. I, for one, have a use for a 300$ house. I have a piece of land on which I would love to be able to place a few smaller cabins. Currently doing so would run me around 15-50k per building.
- duck 15y agoHow do you figure 15-50k? You can build what they are talking about for less than $1000.
- hessenwolf 15y agoI understood from the article that the concern is that the house will be purchased by local government and forced on the poor.