3 ms·
Let's also not forget their digital imaging line, specifically their foray into Mirrorless cameras Sure, they shelved it (Hard to compete with established play
by to11mtm 6y ago
Let's also not forget their digital imaging line, specifically their foray into Mirrorless cameras
Sure, they shelved it (Hard to compete with established players who can spread R&D over volume), but people were pretty amazed at how well Samsung did entering that market from a quality standpoint.
Why does that matter? Because that indicates they have plenty of skill in lens manufacture, which is another critical component to a good fab.
- totalZero 6y agoMakes you wonder why one of the major semiconductor equipment companies doesn't team up with Canon or Nikon and compete with ASML/Zeiss.
- MarkSweep 6y agoCanon and Nikon already makes their own lithography machines: https://global.canon/en/product/indtech/semicon/ https://global.canon/en/product/indtech/semicon/ https://www.nikon.com/products/semi/ https://www.nikon.com/products/semi/
- totalZero 6y agoThat's right. Deep UV. They all but threw in the towel on EUV. But the difference is that ASML + Carl Zeiss absolutely run the market. Nikon has about 10% market share, and Canon 5%. The rest is basically ASML. The thought on my mind is that any one of the major American semiconductor equipment manufacturers could partner with either of the two Japanese optics houses. Canon is worth about US $25B, and its semiconductor business generates about a fifth of its revenue. It's big enough to be useful, but small enough to be acquirable.