> But they're still explicit nulls. Except that there may be other reasons to use pointers than just nullability. And in that case, there's no mechanism to spe

> But they're still explicit nulls. Except that there may be other reasons to use pointers than just nullability. And in that case, there's no mechanism to specify whether or not the thing being pointed to is nullable. I think that's where the implicitness in question comes in.