4 ms·
From Chapter 2 "Teaching for Equity and Engagement" p40: > Ms. Ross teaches fifth grade at the Jackie Robinson Academy. She has been focusing on developing her
by 323454 6y ago
From Chapter 2 "Teaching for Equity and Engagement" p40:
> Ms. Ross teaches fifth grade at the Jackie Robinson Academy. She has been focusing on developing her students’ sociopolitical consciousness through language arts and wants to bring mathematics into their thinking (SMP.1, 2). To begin the process, the class is led in an analysis of word problems from their fifth-grade mathematics textbook (NF.1, 2, 4, 5, 6). Ms. Ross selects three word problems to connect with the class’s current read-aloud of George, a novel by Alex Gino that shares the story of a 10-year-old transgender fourth grader and her struggles with acceptance among friends and family. In doing so, the teacher is reflecting the recommendations of California’s Health Framework, which suggests that sensitive discussions of gender are important for students
> The word problem analysis serves as a springboard for students to investigate their own questions. One student asks, “Are there word problems that have a male knitting a scarf, cooking, cleaning?”; and another ponders, “Does the textbook always use girl names for girl stuff and boy names for boy stuff?” Lastly, another student asks, “Are there word problems that challenge gender stereotypes?” When examining the entire textbook, the students noted that there were a few instances of gender-fluid problems (e.g., David’s dad baked a dozen cookies to share with him, his sister, and his mom); however, the problem continued to conflate gender with a heterosexual identity. The class could not find problems involving non-nuclear families (e.g., two moms, a single dad) or gender nonconforming characters (e.g., John cutting ribbon). Ms. Ross has students notice these patterns, but also asked students to question why certain items (e.g., toys, activities, careers) are perceived as being “for” only girls or boys, and the implications for these assumptions. She continues to engage her students by asking, “Why does this matter? Who does this privilege? Who is silenced?”
This lesson is highlighted as an exemplary instance of mathematics education. The students go on to "fix" the word problems (in one instance completely losing the sense of the original problem).
I think it's good to re-write mathematics textbook word problems to be more inclusive. I don't think it's good to have students play out that process in their math class. Math class is for learning... math. They can learn how to perform a social justice critique in social justice class. If this is representative of the direction the state wants to move in, then I don't have a lot of optimism for the future of public education in California.
- sudosysgen 6y agoThe idea that classes should have interplay with each other is not new. I don't know about you, but in my social sciences classes we did a fair bit of math and even had projects that counted for both math and social sciences, for example. It was in general a good thing. The above isn't an example of pure math education. It's an example of what math teachers should do if they want to incorporate for example elements from the Health or Social Sciences curriculum.
- bigmattystyles 6y agoI would argue that that's because most social sciences are at some level just applied math. Math however isn't social science. I don't want to be dismissive of social progress in curriculums though; I had many advantages growing up but I more than once found myself in classrooms where I didn't speak the language and math class was always a relief because it was just math. I realize this is a rosy view, but there was something to it.
- sudosysgen 6y agoI certainly empathize with you, but as long as most math curriculum is math at it's core, then it is a net benefit for the large majority of students. It does take a skilled teacher to really pull it off. For the vast majority of students, the way they will use math most of the time is only after analyzing problems and translating them to mathematics, which for many students also really does help the math part work better. And ultimately before you start specializing your math classes (some may argue we should do it earlier than is done in the US, and I'd agree), it makes sense to train students to apply math a solid minority of the time in ways that aren't "just math". Until the last two years of so of high school, the skills that are mainly being taught in math class aren't necessarily "just math", and the main reason they are being taught isn't to help people be better at pure math, but because they are foundational skills elsewhere. These ideas aren't just there for fun. They're there because a significant amount of research has been done and replicated dozens of times around the world and found that for the educational objectives at that point in time it is the most efficient way to do so. If the hypothesis is that actually teaching math another way that completely gets rid of word problems and tie-ins to other subjects is more efficient, this is a testable hypothesis that is sure to be very interesting to the scientific community, and I'd love to see it put to the test.