4 ms·
Are you referring to the table which presents categories & then examples of technology that falls under said category? If so, the examples are indeed not in an
by whycombagator 6y ago
Are you referring to the table which presents categories & then examples of technology that falls under said category?
If so, the examples are indeed not in any way exhaustive. But I don’t believe they are intended to be, nor could/should be.
- davydog187 6y agoSure, but arguably RabbitMQ has a much wider adoption and success story as a message broker. Also showing Akka as an actor system, but not mentioning Erlang
- whycombagator 6y agoOkay...to restate what I already have: I'm honestly not sure why not having RabbitMQ/Erlang or X tech listed as an example of Y is such a big deal - especially when the other examples are fine examples.