Please look at this thread again because you brought up ISO and ECMA to derail the thread and it turns out you have to pay to have a say in it, after you said t

Please look at this thread again because you brought up ISO and ECMA to derail the thread and it turns out you have to pay to have a say in it, after you said that: > There is no payment to be a member in ISO. So why bring this up in the first place? and now you're sprinkling clarifications afterwards. When are you going to admit that what you said is incorrect? > ...We are discussing about Rust here, C and C++ WG members don't pay for membership. Incorrect, we are talking about the Rust foundation. Which covers more than just the language. Again, what difference does this make in you having a say as a community member? Seems like you need to join a big company to have a say, because that's all I see. > Again, please provide a famous programming language thriving on the market that fits your beloved world view. So R does not count as a famous thriving programming language that is driven by the community (not corporations) and allows donations? You're more likely to have a say on R than on C, C++ and now Rust.