3 ms·
Because "large" here is still "very tiny". Large with respect to "p-values" isn't the same as "actually large". Equating the "positive results" to "winning th
by anoonmoose 6y ago
Because "large" here is still "very tiny". Large with respect to "p-values" isn't the same as "actually large". Equating the "positive results" to "winning the powerball" is not a fair comparison. If there were Powerball-level results here we wouldn't need further studies to confirm the effect exists.
- yters 6y agoRadin claims in his meta analyses he gets powerball level results, much beyond that in fact. Either these are some quite incompetent and/or deceitful researchers, or they have found something we currently cannot explain.