> I think #2 is probably too high for private citizens to risk needing to pay if their claims are reversed. As a musician I have a hard time imagining a case w

> I think #2 is probably too high for private citizens to risk needing to pay if their claims are reversed. As a musician I have a hard time imagining a case where an honest DMCA takedown could be reversed by someone listening to the same music I am and identifying something else.