I'm with everyone on "incredibly disappointing" valuation. But being pragmatic, I had to accept the idea "it can be addressed later" vs continuing this mess. An

I'm with everyone on "incredibly disappointing" valuation. But being pragmatic, I had to accept the idea "it can be addressed later" vs continuing this mess. And there was truly mess, e.g. PEP642, which initially tried to addressed just this issue, turned in a hairy monster trying to random-patch pattern matching considerably in rather weird ways.